Hello Everyone!
Welcome to Eastern Michigan University, the Information Assurance
Program and to IA-103.
This
course provides an overview of security challenges and strategies of
countermeasure in the information systems environment. Topics include
definition of terms, concepts, elements, and goals incorporating
industry standards and practices with a focus on availability,
vulnerability, integrity and confidentiality aspects of information
systems.
Please take a moment to read through the Syllabus and Course
Information. These sections of the course will give you an
overview of what you are about to learn. Please note information
regarding the required book for the course. Though the Syllabus
and the Course Information differ slightly, the content of the course
remains the same. The schedule we will follow is the one found in
the Course Information. The timing we will follow per Unit
is laid out by date in "Nuts & Bolts".
VERY IMPORTANT: Please read the "Nuts &
Bolts" section carefully. It contains the schedule of when each
unit of study will be available to you. The schedule is set
up in such a way so that you can pace yourself and stay on track
to finish each assignment in a timely fashion. It also contains
details on assignments, exams and grading.
Lastly, please refer to the Instructor Information tab so you know how
to contact me. Online classes can be a challenge due to
lack of personal interaction. That said, I don't want to
just be a faceless grader on the other end of your course. If you
have any questions, concerns or issues, PLEASE feel free to email me or
stop by my office hours.
I look forward to an excellent semester with each and every one of you.
Syllabus
Instructor: Guillermo Moreno
email: Guillermo.moreno@leonagroup.com
Office Hours:
*** Always available via email.
*** Discussion Board on Course Homepage checked Daily.
SCHEDULE OF DATES
- UNIT 1 : 1/9-14
- UNIT 2 : 1/15-21
- UNIT 3 : 1/22-2/4
- UNIT 4 : 2/5-11
- MIDTERM WINDOW : 2/13-17
- UNIT 5 : 2/19-25
- SPRING BREAK: 2/27-3/2
- UNIT 6 : 3/4-10
- UNIT 7 : 3/11-17
- UNIT 8 : 3/18-24
- UNIT 9 : 3/25-31
- UNIT 10: 4/1-15 (Holiday Considered)
- UNIT 11: 4/16-21 (Course Review)
- FINAL EXAM WINDOW: 4/23-27 (in accoordance with University Exam
Schedule)
* Refer to the Course Information (Course Outline) for specific
Reading, Labs and Assignments in each Unit
LABS
Labs are formal assignments that may take the form of articles,
exercises and case studies that must be read and commented
upon. Comments are not graded for content, style or
grammar. Rather, they are graded on demonstrated effort and
insight. Labs are due on or before the last day of the Unit (see
Schedule above). Each Lab is worth 2% of your grade
(with the exception of Unit 7, in which there are 2 Labs worth 1% each).
HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENTS
Homework Assignments are formal, graded work that must be submitted in
the required format. They must be submitted to the correct
Dropbox on or before the last day of the Unit (see Schedule
above). Each Homework assignment is worth 2% of your
grade.
MIDTERM EXAM
The midterm exam will be posted on the first day of the Window (see
Schedule above) before 9:00am. It must be completed and
submitted by 11:59pm on the last day of the Window. The Midterm is worth
30% of your grade.
FINAL EXAM
The final exam will be posted on the first day of the Window (see
Schedule above) before 9:00am. It must be completed and
submitted by 11:59pm on the last day of the Window. The Final Exam is
worth 30% of your grade.
GRADING
Grades on Homework, Labs, etc. will usually be viewable
in the Gradebook within a week of submission to the correct
Dropbox. If you have concerns about a grade, you may
respond via the assignment (dropbox communication), email me, or stop
by my office hours.
"To establish a professional organization committed to aiding students
in the pursuit of a career in the Information Assurance field. In
addition, this group shall be dedicated to furthering the awareness
about the Information Assurance program at Eastern Michigan University,
and help guide students who are interested in that field. Aid may be
defined as providing information, in various forms such as inviting
guest speakers, making students aware of special events and career
openings, and offering them a place to receive academic help with IA
studies."
http://emu.collegiatelink.net/Community?action=getOrgHome&orgID=13740
Unit 1
The first section includes two assignments. *Lab 1 is a Case
Study that you will need to provide commentary on. Homework 1 is a
regular homework assignment. Make sure that your assignments are placed
in the appropriate Dropbox. Assignments sent via email will NOT BE
ACCEPTED. Make sure that both Lab and Homework are in a Microsoft WORD
DOCUMENT. NO OTHER FORMAT WILL BE ACCEPTED. The documents you
create should be fairly concise and not difficult to create and post.
* Lab 1 commentary consists of a well-written paragraph presenting your
opinion on the ethics of the case study. Who was more at
fault and were the damages awarded appropriate? Does the
fault lie with the active wrongdoer (hacker) or the passive wrongdoer
(negligence).
** Please note:
If, in any assignment, you use information other than what is provided
in the Section, you will be required to provide a Works Cited page.
This is especially pertinent for research assignments. No credit will
be given without it.
Please keep due dates and schedules on track.
All assignments for this Section are due no later than 1/14/2012,
11:59 PM.
Reading
Kim,
D., Solomon, M.G., (2011) Fundamentals of Information Systems Security
Jones and
Bartlett Learning. ISBN-13: 978-0-7637-9025-7
Chapter 1 :
Information Systems Security
Power Point:
Fundamentals of Information Sistems Security
Tables 1 to 8 (Unit 1)
Lab 1.1 Case Study
In
March 2010, 28 year-old Albert Gonzalez was sentenced to 20 years in
federal prison for breaching security measures at several well-known
retailers and stealing millions of credit card numbers, which he then
resold across a variety of shadow “carding” Web sites. Using a fairly
simple packet sniffer, Gonzalez was able to steal payment card
transaction data in real time, which he then parked on blind servers in
places such as Latvia and Ukraine—countries formerly part of the Soviet
Union. Gonzalez named his activities “Operation Get Rich or Die Tryin'”
and lived a lavish lifestyle by selling stolen credit card information.
He was eventually tracked down by the U.S. Secret Service, which was
investigating the stolen card ring. Operation Get Rich or Die Tryin'
took place for more than two years and cost major retailers, such as
TJX, OfficeMax, Barnes & Noble, Heartland, and Hannaford, more than
$200 million in losses and recovery costs. It is the largest computer
crime case ever prosecuted.
<>
At
first glance, Operation Get Rich or Die Tryin' seems to be an
open-and-shut case. A hacker commits a series of cybercrimes, is
caught, and is successfully prosecuted. Fault and blame are assigned to
the cybercriminal, and justice is served for the corporations and the
millions of people whose credit card information was compromised.>
<>
Unless
you ask the shareholders, banking partners, and some customers of TJX,
who filed a series of class-action lawsuits against the company
claiming that the “high-level deficiencies” in its security practices
make it at least partially responsible for the damages caused by Albert
Gonzalez and his accomplices. The lawsuits point out, for example, that
the packet sniffer Gonzalez attached to the TJX network went unnoticed
for more than seven months. Court documents also indicate that TJX
failed to notice more than 80 GB of stored data being transferred from
its servers using TJX’s own high-speed network. Finally, an audit
performed by TJX’s payment-card processing partners found that it was
noncompliant with 9 of the 12 requirements for secure payment card
transactions. TJX’s core information security policies were found to be
so ineffective that the judge presiding over sentencing hearing of
Gonzalez reviewed them to determine whether TJX’s damages claim against
him of $171 million is valid.
>
Apart
from lawsuits, TJX faced a serious backlash from customers and the
media when the details of the scope of the breaches trickled out.
Customers reacted angrily when they learned that nearly six weeks had
passed between the discovery of the breach and its notification to the
public. News organizations ran headline stories that painted a picture
of TJX as a clueless and uncaring company. Consumer organizations
openly warned people not to shop at TJX stores. TJX’s reputation and
brand image was shattered in the wake of Operation Get Rich or Die
Tryin', and only a small portion of the damage was actually Albert
Gonzalez’s fault.
<>
The
real lesson of Operation Get Rich or Die Tryin' may not be the crime
itself, but how a lackluster security policy was chiefly responsible
for it happening in the first place.>
Homework # 1